Newt and Zawahiri call for World War

First it was Newt's turn.

So first of all, it's clearly worldwide. I mean, what I just described to you is an initial survey of a worldwide war.

But the second point is equally important. It is a war. We have active enemies, actively trying to kill us, and we have to see the violence in the Middle East in the context of an active war.

And being Americans, we prosecute wars to win them, not to have "reasonable response," not to have "appropriate levels of retaliation." Our theory is you start bombing our cities; we're going to defeat you and make it impossible.

See? It's as simple as defeating the bad guys by killing them. They're bad because they bomb cities, so they must be destroyed, by bombing cities.

Then Zawahiri took his turn.

"All the world is a battlefield open in front of us," said the Egyptian-born al-Zawahiri, second-in-command to Osama bin Laden.
"The war with Israel does not depend on cease-fires...We will attack everywhere."
"The shells and rockets ripping apart Muslim bodies in Gaza and Lebanon are not only Israeli (weapons), but are supplied by all the countries of the crusader coalition. Therefore, every participant in the crime will pay the price," al-Zawahiri said.

See? It's as simple as defeating the bad guys by killing them. They're bad because they bomb cities, so they must be detroyed, by bombing cities.

If only we could all agree on one bad guy to fight together.
Mel Gibson?